Patient-reported measures of tinnitus for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis: Recommendations for clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis is a genetic disease characterized by the development of bilateral vestibular schwannomas, ependymomas, meningiomas, and cataracts. Mild to profound hearing loss and tinnitus are common symptoms reported by individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2. While tinnitus is known to have a significant and negative impact on the quality of life of individuals from the general population, the impact on individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2 is unknown. Consensus regarding the selection of suitable patient-reported outcome measures for assessment could advance further research into tinnitus in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients. The purpose of this work is to achieve a consensus recommendation by the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration for patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate quality of life in the domain of tinnitus for neurofibromatosis type 2 clinical trials. METHODS: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis Patient-Reported Outcomes Communication Subgroup systematically evaluated patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life in the domain of tinnitus for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 2 using previously published Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis rating procedures. Of the 19 identified patient-reported outcome measures, 3 measures were excluded because they were not validated as an outcome measure or could not have been used as a single outcome measure for a clinical trial. Sixteen published patient-reported outcome measures for the domain of tinnitus were scored and compared on their participant characteristics, item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials. RESULTS: The Tinnitus Functional Index was identified as the most highly rated measure for the assessment of tinnitus in populations with neurofibromatosis type 2, due to strengths in the areas of item content, psychometric properties, feasibility, and available scores. DISCUSSION: Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis currently recommends the Tinnitus Functional Index for the assessment of tinnitus in neurofibromatosis type 2 clinical trials.

Improved sensitivity for detection of pathogenic variants in familial NF2-related schwannomatosis.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of additional genetic screening techniques on the rate of detection of pathogenic variants leading to familial NF2-related schwannomatosis. METHODS: We conducted genetic screening of a cohort of 168 second-generation individuals meeting the clinical criteria for NF2-related schwannomatosis. In addition to the current clinical screening techniques, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis, we applied additional genetic screening techniques, including karyotype and RNA analysis. For characterisation of a complex structural variant, we also performed long-read sequencing analysis. RESULTS: Additional genetic analysis resulted in increased sensitivity of detection of pathogenic variants from 87% to 95% in our second-generation NF2-related schwannomatosis cohort. A number of pathogenic variants identified through extended analysis had been previously observed after NGS analysis but had been overlooked or classified as variants of uncertain significance. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates there is added value in performing additional genetic analysis for detection of pathogenic variants that are difficult to identify with current clinical genetic screening methods. In particular, RNA analysis is valuable for accurate classification of non-canonical splicing variants. Karyotype analysis and whole genome sequencing analysis are of particular value for identification of large and/or complex structural variants, with additional advantages in the use of long-read sequencing techniques.

Recommendations for the collection and annotation of biosamples for analysis of biomarkers in neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are characterized by potential lifelong morbidity and life-threatening complications. To date, however, diagnostic and predictive biomarkers are an unmet need in this patient population. The inclusion of biomarker discovery correlatives in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials enables study of low-incidence disease. The implementation of a common data model would further enhance biomarker discovery by enabling effective concatenation of data from multiple studies. METHODS: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis biomarker working group reviewed published data on emerging trends in neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis biomarker research and developed recommendations in a series of consensus meetings. RESULTS: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising assay for neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis biomarker discovery and validation. In addition, we review recommendations for a range of biomarkers in clinical trials, neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis-specific data annotations, and common data models for data integration. CONCLUSION: These Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis consensus guidelines are intended to provide best practices for the inclusion of biomarker studies in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials, data, and sample annotation and to lay a framework for data harmonization and concatenation between trials.

Perspectives of adults with neurofibromatosis regarding the design of psychosocial trials: Results from an anonymous online survey.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Individuals with neurofibromatosis, including neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-related schwannomatosis (SWN), and other forms of SWN, often experience disease manifestations and mental health difficulties for which psychosocial interventions may help. An anonymous online survey of adults with neurofibromatosis assessed their physical, social, and emotional well-being and preferences about psychosocial interventions to inform clinical trial design. METHODS: Neurofibromatosis clinical researchers and patient representatives from the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration developed the survey. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, self-reported diagnosis of NF1, NF2, or SWN, and ability to read and understand English. The online survey was distributed internationally by the Neurofibromatosis Registry and other neurofibromatosis foundations from June to August 2020. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 630 adults (18-81 years of age; M = 45.5) with NF1 (78%), NF2 (14%), and SWN (8%) who were mostly White, not Hispanic/Latino, female, and from the United States. The majority (91%) reported that their neurofibromatosis symptoms had at least some impact on daily life. In the total sample, 51% endorsed a mental health diagnosis, and 27% without a diagnosis believed they had an undiagnosed mental health condition. Participants indicated that neurofibromatosis affected their emotional (44%), physical (38%), and social (35%) functioning to a high degree. Few reported ever having participated in a drug (6%) or psychosocial (7%) clinical trial, yet 68% reported they "probably" or "definitely" would want to participate in a psychosocial trial if it targeted a relevant concern. Top treatment targets were anxiety, healthier lifestyle, and daily stress. Top barriers to participating in psychosocial trials were distance to clinic, costs, and time commitment. Respondents preferred interventions delivered by clinicians via individual sessions or a combination of group and individual sessions, with limited in-person and mostly remote participation. There were no significant group differences by neurofibromatosis type in willingness to participate in psychosocial trials (p = 0.27). Regarding interest in intervention targets, adults with SWN were more likely to prefer psychosocial trials for pain support compared to those with NF1 (p < 0.001) and NF2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study conducted the largest survey assessing physical symptoms, mental health needs, and preferences for psychosocial trials in adults with neurofibromatosis. Results indicate a high prevalence of disease manifestations, psychosocial difficulties, and untreated mental health problems in adults with neurofibromatosis and a high degree of willingness to participate in psychosocial clinical trials. Patient preferences should be considered when designing and implementing psychosocial interventions to develop the most feasible and meaningful studies.

Gene-targeted therapy for neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis: The path to clinical trials.

Numerous successful gene-targeted therapies are arising for the treatment of a variety of rare diseases. At the same time, current treatment options for neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are limited and do not directly address loss of gene/protein function. In addition, treatments have mostly focused on symptomatic tumors, but have failed to address multisystem involvement in these conditions. Gene-targeted therapies hold promise to address these limitations. However, despite intense interest over decades, multiple preclinical and clinical issues need to be resolved before they become a reality. The optimal approaches to gene-, mRNA-, or protein restoration and to delivery to the appropriate cell types remain elusive. Preclinical models that recapitulate manifestations of neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis need to be refined. The development of validated assays for measuring neurofibromin and merlin activity in animal and human tissues will be critical for early-stage trials, as will the selection of appropriate patients, based on their individual genotypes and risk/benefit balance. Once the safety of gene-targeted therapy for symptomatic tumors has been established, the possibility of addressing a wide range of symptoms, including non-tumor manifestations, should be explored. As preclinical efforts are underway, it will be essential to educate both clinicians and those affected by neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis about the risks and benefits of gene-targeted therapy for these conditions.

Management of Central and Peripheral Nervous System Tumors in Patients with Neurofibromatosis.

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis represent a diverse group of genetic tumor predisposition syndromes with a shared feature of tumors affecting the peripheral nerve sheaths. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many advancements have been made in understanding the biologic underpinnings of these conditions, and in 2016 the first drug was approved by the FDA to treat pediatric symptomatic unresectable plexiform neurofibromas. RECENT FINDINGS: Mek inhibitors have provided a much-needed therapeutic avenue for NF1 patients with unresectable plexiform neurofibromas (PN), both for reduction of tumor bulk and for improvement in symptoms. Selumetinib is the first FDA approved drug for PN, but is only approved for children. Some research suggests that alternative Mek inhibitors and other mixed tyrosine kinase inhibitors may have better efficacy in adults. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab can prolong hearing and delay the need for surgery in NF2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. This article provides an update regarding considerations and approaches when treating the tumors associated with the neurofibromatoses (NF), including risk and prognosis metrics, clinical trial results, surgical techniques, and radiation therapy recommendations.

[New classification and approaches to the treatment of schwannomatosis]. / Novaya klassifikatsiya i podkhody k terapii shvannomatozov.

Schwannomatoses is a new classification unit for all the hereditary diseases caused by chromosome 22 damage followed by multiple benign neoplasms of the peripheral and central nervous system. Schwannomatosis occurs as a result of damage to different genes: NF2, SMARCB1, LZRT1, loss of heterozygosity of the long arm of chromosome 22. Nevertheless, clinical manifestations are similar. Molecular diagnostics not only confirms the diagnosis, but also predicts the course of disease. Thus, the most severe clinical manifestations are observed in patients with violation of semantic sequences and reading frame shift in exons 2-13 of the NF2 gene. A more favorable course with less number of tumors is observed in patients with somatic mosaicism. Stereotactic irradiation and surgery are the main treatment options for schwannomatosis. However, there is evidence of effective targeted therapy with bevacizumab (inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor). Bevacizumab is used in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas and high risk of hearing loss, as well as for intramedullary tumor growth control.

Schwannomatosis: a Realm Reborn: year one.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2022, an international consensus recommendation revised the nomenclature for neurofibromatosis type 2 ( NF2 ) and Schwannomatosis (SWN), now grouped under the umbrella term Schwannomatosis, and defined new diagnostic criteria. RECENT FINDINGS: This review describes the molecular criteria for diagnosis of schwannomatosis and the subsequent diagnosis strategy, while setting out the most recent advances in our understanding of the natural history, pathology, molecular biology and treatment of schwannomatosis-associated tumors, including schwannomas, meningiomas and ependymomas. SUMMARY: Somatic mutation screening should become a new standard for the diagnosis of NF2 -, LTZTR1 -, SMARCB1 - and 22q-schwannomatosis to discriminate those conditions. Constitutional events in NF2 -Schwannomatosis have a major influence on disease severity and justifiably motivate ongoing efforts on gene replacement therapy research. On the other hand, underlying mechanisms of disease severity and associated pain remain largely unknown in non- NF2 -SWN and independent of germline mutation. Research efforts therefore focus on pain relief in ongoing trials and the discovery of new molecular mechanisms underlying schwannoma tumorigenesis/pain/neuropathies.

Neurofibromatosis- and schwannomatosis-associated tumors: Approaches to genetic testing and counseling considerations.

Neurofibromatosis (NF) and schwannomatosis (SWN) are genetic conditions characterized by the risk of developing nervous system tumors. Recently revised diagnostic criteria include the addition of genetic testing to confirm a pathogenic variant, as well as to detect the presence of mosaicism. Therefore, the use and interpretation of both germline and tumor-based testing have increasing importance in the diagnostic approach, treatment decisions, and risk stratification of these conditions. This focused review discusses approaches to genetic testing of NF- and SWN-related tumor types, which are somewhat rare and perhaps lesser known to non-specialized clinicians. These include gastrointestinal stromal tumors, breast cancer, plexiform neurofibromas with or without transformation to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, gliomas, and schwannomas, and emphasizes the need for inclusion of genetic providers in patient care and appropriate pre- and post-test education, genetic counseling, and focused evaluation by a medical geneticist or other healthcare provider familiar with clinical manifestations of these disorders.

[Neurofibromatosis]. / Neurofibromatose.

BACKGROUND & FOCUS: While the Neurofibromatoses have been observed and classified by their phenotypes for several centuries, their great variability constitutes a considerable challenge in diagnostics and therapy selection. This article focuses on highlighting the three most frequent sub-types NF1, NF2 and NF3. METHODS: All three NF types are outlined by the following measures: the history of their clinical detection, the typical appearance, the underlying genetic constitution and its consequences, the official diagnostic criteria, the mandatory diagnostic steps and finally the treatment opportunities and specific risks. RESULTS: About 50% of NF patients have a positive family history and the other 50% are the first symptomatic generations and suffer from new mutations. A considerable (unknown) number of patients do not exhibit a complete genetic NF constitution, but have a so-called mosaic sub-form with only a limited number of cells being genetically affected and prone to tumorous changes. The neurofibromatoses are neuro-cutaneous diseases with manifestations at the skin and nervous system, except for NF 3, where the skin and eyes are never affected. Skin and eye manifestations, especially pigmentation disturbances, mostly started early in childhood and adolescence. The underlying genetic constitutions, on chromosome 17 in NF1 and on chromosome 22 in NF2 and NF3, cause a defect in tumor suppressor genes and lead to excessive proliferation of Schwann cells. Major features are tumors of the peripheral nerves, including cranial and spinal nerves leading to tumors with considerable nerve, brain and spinal cord compression and resulting in pain, sensory and motor deficits. A further variable disease feature may be neuropathy with neuropathic pain, related to tumor formation or even independent of it.Although benign by histopathology and growing rather slowly, those tumors often cause progressive neurological deficit and loss of function. Loss of function may be prevented by adequate timing of therapy such as nerve decompression by microsurgical tumor resection or reduction, medication with immunotherapy or radiotherapy in selected cases. To date it is unknown why some tumors remained silent and stable while others progress and show periods of accelerated growth.As a consequence, NF patients need to be accompanied by a specialized interdisciplinary NF team at long-term, with a clear-cut standardized protocol for clinical and imaging controls along with counseling and support in decision-making.Further, NF patients may suffer from reactive depression due to the danger of losing essential neural functions, such as vision or audition or movement. And especially NF1 patients show characteristics of ADHS and other cognitive compromise in at least 50% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: As the neurofibromatosis belong to the so-called rare diseases, all patients with a suspicion or diagnosis of NF should get the opportunity to present to an interdisciplinary NF Center, mostly situated at University Hospitals, where competent counseling on the individual disease phenotype may be provided. Here the patients will be informed on the necessary diagnostic steps, their frequency as well as on practical steps in case of acute deterioration. Most NF centers are run by neurosurgeons or neurologists or pediatricians, working in a network with geneticists, neuro-radiologists, ophthalmologists, dermatologists, plastic and general surgeons, psychologists, psychiatrists and social work experts. They participate regularly in neuro-oncological tumor and sarcoma tumor boards, skull base tumor centers, comprehensive hearing centers, and deliver all the treatment opportunities provided by certified brain tumor centers, among those the inclusion in special diagnostic and treatment studies or the contact information to patient support groups.

Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannomas: Current State and New Horizons.

Vestibular schwannomas continue to cause hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, imbalance, and tinnitus. These symptoms are compounded by germline neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) gene loss and multiple intracranial and spinal cord tumors associated with NF2-related schwannomatosis. The current treatments of observation, microsurgical resection, or stereotactic radiation may prevent catastrophic brainstem compression but are all associated with the loss of cranial nerve function, particularly hearing loss. Novel targeted treatment options to stop tumor progression include small molecule inhibitors, immunotherapy, anti-inflammatory drugs, radio-sensitizing and sclerosing agents, and gene therapy.

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome and growth deficiency in an Iranian girl due to a pathogenic variant in NF1 gene.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in NF1 gene could cause allelic disorders with clinical spectrum of Neurofibromatosis type 1 to Noonan syndrome. Here, a 7-year-old Iranian girl is described with Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome due to a pathogenic variant in NF1 gene. METHODS: Clinical evaluations were performed along with genetic testing using whole exome sequencing (WES). The variant analysis including pathogenicity prediction was also done using bioinformatics tools. RESULTS: The chief compliant of the patient was short stature and lack of proper weight gain. Other symptoms were developmental delay, learning disability, inadequate speech skill, broad forehead, hypertelorism, and epicanthal folds, low set ears and webbed neck. A small deletion, c.4375-4377delGAA, was found in NF1 gene using WES. This variant was classified as pathogenic according to ACMG. CONCLUSIONS: NF1 variants may show variable phenotypes among the patients; identifying such variants is helpful in therapeutic management of the disease. WES is considered as an appropriate test to diagnose Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome.

Updated protocol for genetic testing, screening and clinical management of individuals at risk of NF2-related schwannomatosis.

Genetic testing and management of individuals at risk for NF2-related schwannomatosis is complicated by the high rate of mosaicism resulting in a milder, later onset, more asymmetrical disease and the phenotypic overlap with the related schwannomatosis conditions. This updated protocol has been devised for the English NF2-related schwannomatosis service. It provides those affected with mosaic NF2-related schwannomatosis estimated risks of having an affected child; and management guidelines both for individuals at risk of NF2-related schwannomatosis, or with potential disease, due to having features that fall short of consensus diagnostic criteria. Risks of mosaicism and inferred transmission risks were derived from genetic testing of over 1000 individuals through the Manchester NF2 genetic testing service. This updated protocol, reflects the lower transmission risks now inferred in mosaic NF2-related schwannomatosis, informed by the greater sensitivity of Next Generation Sequencing in detecting low levels of mosaicism in blood, along with improved ability to analyse tumour DNA. Screening for features of NF2-related schwannomatosis is proposed until the risk of having the condition falls below a pragmatic threshold of 1%. Using these revised transmission figures, this threshold can now be reached at a younger age in many of those at risk, with earlier reassurance and discharge.

A Novel Heterozygous NF1 Variant in a Neurofibromatosis-Noonan Syndrome Patient with Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Case Report

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS), a rare autosomal-dominant hereditary disease, is characterized by clinical manifestations of both neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and NS. We present a case of NFNS with short stature caused by a heterozygous nonsense variant of the NF1 gene. A 12-year-old boy was admitted because of short stature, numerous café-au-lait spots, low-set and posteriorly rotated ears, sparse eyebrows, broad forehead, and inverted triangular face. Cranial and spinal magnetic resonance imaging showed abnormal nodular lesions. Molecular analysis revealed a novel heterozygous c.6189 C > G (p.(Tyr2063*)) variant in the NF1 gene. The patient was not prescribed recombinant growth hormone (GH) therapy because exogenous GH may have enlarged the abnormal skeletal lesions. During follow-up, Lisch nodules were found in the ophthalmologic examination. NFNS, a variant form of NF1, is caused by heterozygous mutations in the NF1 gene. The mechanism of GH deficiency caused by NF1 is still unclear. Whether NFNS patients should be treated with exogenous GH remains controversial.

Updated diagnostic criteria and nomenclature for neurofibromatosis type 2 and schwannomatosis: An international consensus recommendation.

PURPOSE: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SWN) are genetically distinct tumor predisposition syndromes with overlapping phenotypes. We sought to update the diagnostic criteria for NF2 and SWN by incorporating recent advances in genetics, ophthalmology, neuropathology, and neuroimaging. METHODS: We used a multistep process, beginning with a Delphi method involving global disease experts and subsequently involving non-neurofibromatosis clinical experts, patients, and foundations/patient advocacy groups. RESULTS: We reached consensus on the minimal clinical and genetic criteria for diagnosing NF2 and SWN. These criteria incorporate mosaic forms of these conditions. In addition, we recommend updated nomenclature for these disorders to emphasize their phenotypic overlap and to minimize misdiagnosis with neurofibromatosis type 1. CONCLUSION: The updated criteria for NF2 and SWN incorporate clinical features and genetic testing, with a focus on using molecular data to differentiate the 2 conditions. It is likely that continued refinement of these new criteria will be necessary as investigators study the diagnostic properties of the revised criteria and identify new genes associated with SWN. In the revised nomenclature, the term "neurofibromatosis 2" has been retired to improve diagnostic specificity.

Understanding barriers to diagnosis in a rare, genetic disease: Delays and errors in diagnosing schwannomatosis.

Diagnosis of rare, genetic diseases is challenging, but conceptual frameworks of the diagnostic process can guide quality improvement initiatives. Using the National Academy of Medicine diagnostic framework, we assessed the extent of, and reasons for diagnostic delays and diagnostic errors in schwannomatosis, a neurogenetic syndrome characterized by nerve sheath tumors and chronic pain. We reviewed the medical records of 97 people with confirmed or probable schwannomatosis seen in two US tertiary care clinics. Time-to-event analysis revealed a median time from first symptom to diagnosis of 16.7 years (95% CI, 7.5-26.0 years) and median time from first medical consultation to diagnosis of 9.8 years (95% CI, 3.5-16.2 years). Factors associated with longer times to diagnosis included initial signs/symptoms that were intermittent, non-specific, or occurred at younger ages (p < 0.05). Thirty-six percent of patients were misdiagnosed; misdiagnoses were of underlying genetic condition (18.6%), pain etiology (16.5%), and nerve sheath tumor presence/pathology (11.3%) (non-mutually exclusive categories). One-fifth (19.6%) of patients had a clear missed opportunity for genetics workup that could have led to an earlier schwannomatosis diagnosis. These results suggest that interventions in clinician education, genetic testing availability, expert review of pathology findings, and automatic triggers for genetics referrals may improve diagnosis of schwannomatosis.